Introduction

In the last two decades the wired version of LAN has gained wide popularity and largescale deployment. The IEEE 802.3 standard has been revised and extended every few years. High-speed versions with transmission rate as high as 1000 Mbps are currently available. Until recently wireless version of LANs were not popular because of the following reasons:

·         High cost: Previously the equipment’s cost more.

·         Low data rate: Initially, the data rate supported by the WLAN is too less, so it supports only a few applications.

·         Occupational safety concerns

·         Licensing requirements

In the last couple of years the situation has changed significantly. Cheaper, smaller and powerful notebook computers and other mobile computing equipment have proliferated in homes and offices. These devices share various resources such as printers, files and Broadband Internet connections. This has opened up the need for wireless LAN. Wireless LANs also offer a number of other advantages compared to their wired counterpart.

Before going into the technical details of Wireless LAN let us first look at various reasons which have led to the development of WLANs. Some of the advantages are mentioned below:

·         Availability of low-cost portable equipment’s: Due to the technology enhancements, the equipment cost that are required for WLAN set-up have reduced a lot.

·         Mobility: An increasing number of LAN users are becoming mobile. These mobile users require that they are connected to the network regardless of where they are because they want simultaneous access to the network. This makes the use of cables, or wired LANs, impractical if not impossible. Wireless LAN can provide users mobility, which is likely to increase productivity, user convenience and various service opportunities.

·         Installation speed and simplicity: Wireless LANs are very easy to install. There is no requirement for wiring every workstation and every room. This ease of installation makes wireless LANs inherently flexible. If a workstation must be moved, it can be done easily and without additional wiring, cable drops or reconfiguration of the network.

·         Installation flexibility: If a company moves to a new location, the wireless system is much easier to move than ripping up all of the cables that a wired system would have snaked throughout the building. This also provides portability. Wireless technology allows network to go anywhere wire cannot reach.

·         Reduced cost of ownership: While the initial cost of wireless LAN can be higher than the cost of wired LAN hardware, it is envisaged that the overall installation expenses and life cycle costs can be significantly lower. Long-term cost-benefits are greater in dynamic environment requiring frequent moves and changes.

·         Scalability: Wireless LAN can be configured in a variety of topologies to meet the users need and can be easily scaled to cover a large area with thousands of users roaming within it.

However, wireless LAN technology needs to overcome a number of inherent limitations and challenges. Some of the limitations and challenges are mentioned below:

·         Lower reliability due to susceptibility of radio transmission to noise and interference. • Fluctuation of the strength of the received signal through multiple paths causing fading.

·         Vulnerable to eavesdropping leading to security problem.

·         Limited data rate because of the use of spread spectrum transmission techniques enforced to ISM band users.

In this lesson we shall introduce the wireless LAN technology based on IEEE 802.11 standard. Its predecessor the IEEE 802.3, commonly referred to as the Ethernet, is the most widely deployed member of the family. IEEE 802.11 is commonly referred to as wireless Ethernet because of its close similarity with the IEEE 802.3. Like IEEE 802.3, it also defines only two bottom levels of ISO’s open system Interconnection (OSI) model as shown in Fig. 5.7.1. As it shares the upper layers with other LAN standards, it is relatively easy to bridge the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs to other IEEE 802.11 wired LANs to form an extended interconnected wired and wireless LAN network. Although initially wireless LANs were perceived to be as a substitute to wired LANs, now it is recognized as an indispensable adjunct to wired LANs.

                           Figure ; OSI Reference Model and IEEE 802.11

The IEEE 802.11 standard basically defines the physical and data link layer. In the later sections we shall look at detailed implementations.

Transmission Media

There are three media that can be used for transmission over wireless LANs. Infrared, radio frequency and microwave. In 1985 the United States released the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) frequency bands. These bands are 902 – 928MHz, 2.4 – 2.4853 GHz, and 5.725 – 5.85 GHz and do not require licensing by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This prompted most of the wireless LAN products to operate within ISM bands. The FCC did put restrictions on the ISM bands however. In the U.S. radio frequency (RF) systems must implement spread spectrum technology. RF systems must confine the emitted spectrum to a band. RF is also limited to one watt of power. Microwave systems are considered very low power systems and must operate at 500 milliwatts or less.

Infrared

Infrared systems (IR systems) are simple in design and therefore inexpensive. They use the same signal frequencies used on fiber optic links. IR systems detect only the amplitude of the signal and so interference is greatly reduced. These systems are not bandwidth limited and thus can achieve transmission speeds greater than the other systems. Infrared transmission operates in the light spectrum and does not require a license from the FCC to operate. There are two conventional ways to set up an IR LAN.

The infrared transmissions can be aimed. This gives a good range of a couple of kilometre and can be used outdoors. It also offers the highest bandwidth and throughput.

The other way is to transmit omni-directionally and bounce the signals off of everything in every direction. This reduces coverage to 30 – 60 feet, but it is area coverage. IR technology was initially very popular because it delivered high data rates and relatively cheap price.

The drawbacks to IR systems are that the transmission spectrum is shared with the sun and other things such as fluorescent lights. If there is enough interference from other sources it can render the LAN useless. IR systems require an unobstructed line of sight (LOS). IR signals cannot penetrate opaque objects. This means that walls, dividers, curtains, or even fog can obstruct the signal. InfraLAN is an example of wireless LANs using infrared technology.

Microwave

Microwave (MW) systems operate at less than 500 milliwatts of power in compliance with FCC regulations. MW systems are by far the fewest on the market. They use narrow-band transmission with single frequency modulation and are set up mostly in the 5.8GHz band. The big advantage to MW systems is higher throughput achieved because they do not have the overhead involved with spread spectrum systems. RadioLAN is an example of systems with microwave technology.